Skip to content

Conversation

@rimapol
Copy link
Collaborator

@rimapol rimapol commented May 22, 2025

  • All tests passed. If this feature is not already covered by the tests, I added new tests.
  • All static analysis checks passed.
  • This pull request is on the dev branch.
  • I used gofmt for formatting the code before submitting the pull request.

@rimapol rimapol requested review from fluxxBot and removed request for RobiNino May 22, 2025 20:48
@rimapol rimapol removed the request for review from EyalDelarea June 10, 2025 08:45
if !isSearchBasedSpec && !isPattern {
return errorutils.CheckErrorf("spec must include a pattern")
}
if isBuild && isBundle {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this condition removed?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fluxxBot Because this condition isn't valid anymore. It may be both builds and bundles

@rimapol rimapol requested a review from fluxxBot June 17, 2025 12:44
@rimapol rimapol merged commit 54ff6f6 into jfrog:dev Jun 19, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants